IT TOOK the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals 70 days to issue its ruling in International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) v Trump, a challenge to Donald Trump’s third attempt to ban travel from countries he deems threatening to America. We now know what took the 13 judges so long: the decision, released on February 15th, includes eight opinions spanning 285 pages. Travel ban 3.0 remains a poorly masked reflection of the president’s disdain for Muslims, the court found by a 9-4 vote. Contempt for and irrational fear of a religious group cannot be squared, Chief Judge Roger Gregory wrote, with the First Amendment’s bar on religious discrimination.
The rebuke to Mr Trump follows a ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals last month. Unlike the Ninth Circuit decision, which limited its analysis to whether the president’s travel rules exceed his authority...Continue reading
from United States http://ift.tt/2EwyX8A
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment