“A TODDLER drowns in the swimming pool of his neighbour’s vacant house. A firefighter dies falling through the floor of a vacant building. A gang take over an empty house…to advertise prostitution.” Thus begins an incendiary supporting brief filed by a trade union for police officers and firefighters in a suit brought by the city of Miami against Wells Fargo and Bank of America. The suit argues that mortgages granted by the banks to black and Hispanic residents who later defaulted caused the city to lose tax revenue and forced it to fork out more for services. This, it contends, entitles Miami to damages.
The case was largely dismissed in the trial court, reversed on appeal and then accepted by the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments on November 8th. At issue is who can sue for alleged discrimination, and whether irresponsible loans can be blamed for broader economic damage. A separate court will consider whether the banks were actually guilty of discrimination (they deny it).
Part of civil-rights legislation passed in 1968, the “Fair Housing Act”, the statute under which the case...Continue reading
from Economics http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21709977-city-seeks-right-sue-banks-irresponsible-mortgage-lending-cost?fsrc=rss
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment