MOST Americans would probably agree that America needs to stay engaged in the Middle East. Its oil production keeps the global economy afloat; its often-weak states, if they fail completely, can become havens for extremist groups. But a bitter war in Iraq, a less disastrous but still unpopular intervention in Libya, and a failed democratic revolt in Egypt, a key ally, has made Americans leery about any new commitment of military force. That creates a dilemma for the next president, because the one thing Americans do want is the destruction of Islamic State, which holds swathes of Iraq and Syria and urges its followers to carry out terror attacks in the West. What do the presidential candidates believe should be done?
Hillary Clinton, a former secretary of state with long experience in crafting American foreign policy, favours a low risk plan little different from that pursued by Barack Obama: use air power to support Kurdish and Arab allies slowly moving in on IS strongholds and special forces would train local troops, preferably with origins in IS-held regions, to garrison the cities after they have been taken back. She vows an “intelligence surge” to hunt jihadi leaders,...Continue reading
from United States http://ift.tt/2d7T03q
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment